When Roles Don’t Reverse: What Love Is Blind Teaches Us About Women Earning More
Megan and Jordan's breakup wasn't about money, it was about compromise.
Love Is Blind’s Megan and Jordan show what happens when money flips traditional roles—but flexibility doesn’t.
This Happened on Love Is Blind, and I Recognized Myself in It
This season on Love Is Blind, Megan and Jordan’s story hit close to home.
Watching them struggle to blend two very different lives, I saw parts of my own relationship—and the quiet ways independence can complicate love.
Now that my kids are grown, I can travel anytime I want. I can book a flight on a whim, take a spontaneous trip, or go to a concert on a Tuesday night. It’s a kind of independence I worked hard for—financially, emotionally, and professionally.
But I’m no longer single. My boyfriend has two young kids, and when they’re with us, our world slows down. Homework. Bedtime routines. Early mornings. There are nights when the city feels alive and I’m home on the couch instead. He tells me to go out, and sometimes I do, but at a certain point, you can’t opt in and out of love.
He tries too. On our kid-free weeks, he plans dinners, trips, and concerts—things that make me feel alive again. It isn’t easy, but it works because we both keep adjusting.
That push and pull—between freedom and structure—is exactly what I saw in Megan and Jordan.
When Independence Meets Structure
In the pods, they fell in love easily. Jordan was grounded, confident, open. Megan felt safe and adored.
Outside the pods, reality set in.
Megan had achieved what many women today aspire to: financial freedom and control over her time. Jordan was a single dad with a ten-hour workday and a son with Type 1 diabetes. His life revolved around routine. Even when his son wasn’t there, he kept the same tight schedule.
Megan wasn’t rejecting him; she was rejecting a version of life that felt too small. She didn’t want to downgrade her lifestyle—she just wanted to keep the freedom she’d earned. And he didn’t want to change the structure that made his life work.
They both wanted love, but neither could imagine how to merge their worlds.
They Didn't Lack Money - They Lacked Creativity
People love to say relationships require compromise, but the real skill is creativity.
Men have long married women who make less, who stay home, or whose jobs demand flexibility from them. In those dynamics, men often adjust—financially, emotionally, logistically.
When the woman earns more, that flexibility often disappears. The question of who supports whom becomes uncomfortable.
Megan and Jordan never had the conversation that could have changed everything: What do you want? How can I support that? What would our life look like if we got creative?
They didn’t fail because of money. They failed because they couldn’t imagine a version of partnership that honored both of their lives.
When Roles Don’t Reverse
When women gain financial freedom, the relationship equation changes. She doesn’t need a partner—she has to want one.
For Megan, money represented more than comfort. It represented safety. She’d worked to protect herself from dependence and disappointment. Jordan’s structured life—his need for control, his unbending schedule—was its own kind of armor too.
They both came into love wearing protection. But real partnership isn’t about protecting what you have. It’s about sharing it.
Money and independence can shield you from risk, but they can also shield you from connection. The real test isn’t whether someone can “keep up.” It’s whether both people are willing to make sacrifices for love.
Jordan could have asked: How do we build a life that works for both of us?
Megan could have said: What would it look like to be part of your world sometimes?
Instead, they held their ground—each believing love should fit neatly into the lives they’d already built.
Money, Love, and the Shape of Compatibility
Compatibility isn’t about liking the same movies or food—it’s about being able to adapt to each other’s lives.
As we get older, wealthier, and more set in our ways, flexibility becomes the new currency of love.
Love can bridge distance, difference, even time zones. But it can’t survive if both people insist on living exactly as they did before.
For Megan and Jordan, love was real. It just wasn’t sustainable.
He needed structure. She needed space. Neither was wrong—they simply couldn’t build the bridge between them.
Redefining Partnership for the Next Generation
Maybe partnership today isn’t about merging lives completely. Maybe it’s about designing a relationship that lets two people stay true to themselves and to each other.
When women earn more, the goalposts move. Support looks different. Equality looks different. The couples who thrive will be the ones willing to imagine new forms of love—ones that make room for both ambition and intimacy, both security and spontaneity.
Because at the end of the day, love might be blind—but lifestyle isn’t.